Hi
Thanks for this.
I'll address the points seperately...will make it easier.
Firstly, with regard to editing (and this will refer mainly to the writing) - well, aside from some layout errors, the reviews need a lot of polish before they are finalised. And by 'polish', I mean someone has to neaten up all the rough patches, streamline some of the sentences and paragraphs and improve the overall flow of the review.
The reviews were community reviews and have not been edited in any way and this is where the fault lies. We did not proofread or edit them at all.
It has already been noted to have a standard format for reviews and it one of the things that we are looking at will be a minimum number of words.
I am loathe to introduce any stricter formats as in ratings etc. to this as it will remove the "community" feel for the reviews.
As for staff writer reviews, I will be introducing a more rigid review format and would like your input for that.
I was thinking of: Minimum number of words. Addressing Visuals, Audio, Design, Orginality, Story and Overall.
It really helps to have three or four pairs of eyes going over the same work, that way you can pick out more of the mistakes and improve the quality of the writing. That's where you need sub-editors.
We did not want to involve any other members aside from myself and Jason to do the 1st magazine for no other reason than it is something that we wanted to do for the community, which includes you. We were not too certain as to what the feedback would be for the 1st magazine and wanted to remove you from that if it turns out to be negative.
I have already messaged Jason that we will be looking at 2 assistant editors.
1 for editing and general proof reading and another for DTP and layout.
I have already contacted one for the DTP and layout and another person approached us for editing and proof reading.
The fanart page should also contain names of the artists - otherwise it's just a random collection of pictures.
This is something that I noticed when the magazine was launched.
The last week was manic for myself and Jason due to work and general life issues that came up.
We had very little opportunity to review and change additional layout concerns or make changes.
Also, if you're going to do features of ongoing anime, it chould be more detailed, and including more opinion-related writing would be nice - ANN does something similar with ongoing anime, and I think it's very effective.
This is something that we will address with future reviews and articles.
I want the magazine to be more opinion driven.
And... four stars for Dog Days? Seriously? o.0
/shrug
Opinions differ.

The changes that will be made:
- 2 Assistant Editors (Proof reading and general editing & DTP and Layout)
- Strict deadlines for submissions and contributions.
- Dedicated forms of communication for submissions.
- Standardised format reviews for staff writers.
- Minimum requirements for community reviews.